L.O.A.: 17’ 4" (5.28 M)

BEAM: 7’ 3” (2.21 M)

DRAFT: 12” (0.30 M)

WEIGHT (DRY, NO ENGINE): 1,700 LBS (771KG)

MAXIMUM WEIGHT CAPACITY: 1,900 LBS (862KG)

SWAMPED CAPACITY: 2,800 LBS (1,270KG)

PERSONS CAPACITY: 7

MAXIMUM HORSEPOWER: 115 HP (85.8 KW)

MINIMUM HORSEPOWER: 90 HP (67 KW)

DEADRISE AT TRANSOM: 16

FUEL CAPACITY: 25 GALLONS (94.6 L)

MAXIMUM ENGINE WEIGHT: 410 LBS (186 KG)

TRANSOM HEIGHT: 25” (0.50 M)

BRIDGE CLEARANCE (NO TOP): 4’ 11” (1.49 M)

BRIDGE CLEARANCE (WITH SUN-TOP): 6’ 8” (2.03 M)

L.O.A.: 17’ (5.18 M)

BEAM: 6’ 10” (2.08 M)

DRAFT: 9” (0.22 M)

WEIGHT (DRY, NO ENGINE): 1,400 LBS (635 KG)

MAXIMUM WEIGHT CAPACITY: 1,650 LBS (748 KG)

WEIGHT (WITH ENGINES, FUEL AND WATER, IF APPLICABLE): 1,890 LBS. (857 KG)

SWAMPED CAPACITY: 3,400 LBS (1,542 KG)

HEIGHT (KEEL TO HIGHEST POINT): 5’ 4”

HEIGHT (LOWEST TIP UNDERWATER GEAR, IN DOWN POSITION, TO TOP OF WINDSHIELD/HARDTOP): 6’ 4”

PERSONS CAPACITY: 7

MAXIMUM HORSEPOWER: 90 HP (67 KW)

MINIMUM HORSEPOWER: 60 HP (44.8 KW)

DEADRISE AT TRANSOM: 16

FUEL CAPACITY: 13 GALLONS (49.2 L)

MAXIMUM ENGINE WEIGHT: 410 LBS (186 KG)

TRANSOM HEIGHT: 20” (0.50 M)

LIVEWELL VOLUME: 12 GALLONS (45.4 L)(OPTIONAL)

BRIDGE CLEARANCE (NO TOP): 4’ 11” (1.49 M)

BRIDGE CLEARANCE (WITH SUN-TOP): 6’ 11” (2.10 M)

PACKAGE BOAT SPECS (WITH TRAILER/ENGINE UP): 20’ 4”L X 7’ 8”W X 7’ 0”H

EUROPEAN CERTIFICATION: C

masbama wrote:
It's a shame they didn't bump up the max hp to 70 for the 150.

ClevelandBill wrote:
This gets confusing.

First, the Classic Montauk 17 weighs about the same as the current 150 Super Sport and current 150 Montauk. Yet the old Montauk was rated for 100HP versus 60HP for these two 15' boats.

The 2017 and earlier Montauk 170 is a HUGE boat compared to the above ... at 1400 pounds, 500 pounds heavier. And rated for 90HP. The 2018 Montauk at 1700 pounds is nearly double the weight of the 150 SS, 150 Montauk, and old Montauk 17. It should have a heckuva lot more HP rating.

Compared to the classic Montauk 17, the new 170 Montauk (and especially the 2018 170 Montauk) are massively bigger boats, like the old Outrage 18 (even it was lighter). The deeper V hull and the added weight make the 170 Montauks much better riding in chop, by most accounts--but I have no direct experience with the new Montauk ... is it better?

And yet, the 190 Outrage is yet heavier than the 2018 170 Montauk.

As the feature set comes closer together, will the Outrage line move up in size, dropping the smaller boats in favor of Montauks and/or Dauntlesses? There does seem to be a lot of overlap in the lineup, and that cannot be good for costs of manufacturing or marketing.

Phil T wrote:
I think we should start calling it the Montauk 170 II so as not to confuse the two different versions.

Joe Kriz wrote:
Not much difference in the 150 Montauk versus the 150 Montauk II.
Same length, beam, weight, engine sizes, etc.
It only seems the draft is 2 inches more, but why?
http://www.whalercentral.com/userphot...owstart=60

Phil T wrote:
Did anyone note the loss in swamp capacity for the Montauk 170 II? 600 lbs reduction compared to the Montauk 170. 2800 lbs vs. 3400 lbs

As these boats get heavier, it goes down significantly.

Joe Kriz wrote:
What did he call it?...